National
Alliance Against Christian Discrimination "Protecting and Promoting the Christian Faith and
Our Religious Heritage."
Updates 2:
Jeffersons Religiosity
Enter most preserved 19th-century one-room schoolhouses. What they
share are the Ten Commandments hanging on walls and a depiction of George
Washington, often kneeling in prayer at Valley Forge.
Many today desire these religious symbols be returned to public school
classrooms. They long to re-live those days of yesteryear when students
studied the Bible after beginning the school day with prayers to the Almighty
who preserved Washington on bent knee. Where did the Ten Commandments
and prayer in public schools come from?
Thomas Jefferson carved a model of public education that embraced the
spirit of Christianity, holding high the Bible as the source and fountain
of all true wisdom, morals and government. He wanted public education
to foster those religious sentiments with which students of high culture
and keen minds mutually agreed. (Jack Van Ens. Guest Commentary.
The Denver Post. 7/11/99.)
Day of Prayer Nixed
A nonbinding resolution calling for a national Day of Prayer and
Fasting failed in the house on 6/29/99, as Congress waded once again into
volatile issues of religion and politics. Sponsored by Rep. Helen Chenoweth
(R-Idaho), the resolution recommended that national, state and local leaders
call the people they se5ve to observe a day of solemn prayer, fasting
and humiliation before God. The vote was 275 in favor, with 140
opposed and 11 members voting present. If there ever is a time to
call upon God, its now, Chenoweth said. (The Denver
Post. 6/30/99.)
Religious Protection
The Religious Liberties Protection Act (RLPA) has been overwhelmingly
passed by the House (306 to 118). Under this law, local governments will
be prohibited from substantially burdening a persons religious
exercise unless they can prove a compelling governmental interest
to do so. It will also ensure that religious institutions are treated
on equal terms with non-religious institutions and not subject
to discrimination. The bill will be presented to the Senate. (Christian
Coalition. 7/16/99.)
Victory for Prayer
In 1997, U.S. District Judge Ira DeMent handed down an injunction
that was one of our nations most damaging legal assaults on the
rights of religious students to express themselves. That ruling was recently
struck down!
In a 3-0 decision, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta ruled
that Judge DeMent wrongly restricted student-initiated prayer at DeKalb,
Alabama schools. This is a victory for all the school children in
the public schools of our state, that they do not surrender their constitutional
rights when they attend a public school in Alabama, said Attorney
General Bill Pryor. (Liberty Alliance. 7/16/99.)
Valedictorian Valor
The valedictorian of the class of 99 at Deposit High School
in Windsor defied his principal and included references to God and to
his Christian faith in his valedictory speech. School authorities objected
to a poem and to religious remarks in a draft of the speech. John Woodford
sought legal advice from the Rutherford Institute, then determined to
give the speech and poem as written, and to include a personal invitation
to consider Christianity. The speech was warmly received by Woodfords
fellow students and by members of the audience. School officials have
elected not to take any action against Woodford. (Evangelical Press
News Service. 7/16/99.)
Prayer Ban Rejected
When students at a Calvert County high school wanted to include
a prayer in their graduation ceremony, their wishes were overruled by
the objections of one student. A planned prayer was replaced by a moment
of silence. But when the graduation ceremony was underway, the audience
turned out to have plans of its own. During the moment of silence, a mans
voice began clearly praying, Our Father, who art in Heaven
The prayer quickly spread through the hall, as thousands of voices joined
to defy the prayer ban, and insist that God be invited to the ceremony.
This is a churchgoing community, and no one in Annapolis or Washington,
D.C., is going to tell us when and where we can pray, said County
Commissioners President Linda Kelley, who joined in the recitation of
the Lords Prayer. The school administrators did the legal
thing and complied with the law. But the audience took this one over.
(Maranatha Christian Journal. NewsWatch. 7/16/99.)
A Witch Wins
A witch aided by the American Civil Liberties Union ousted the Christian
fish from a city seal. A federal judge ruled in favor of Jean
Webb, a practitioner of Wicca and former resident of Republic, Missouri,
who sued the city to remove the symbol of the fish as its official seal.
She claimed that the symbol constituted a violation of the First Amendment
and created an uneasy atmosphere for non-Christians. U.S. District Judge
Russell Clark agreed. (Current News Summary. ReligionToday.com. 7/16/99.)
Dallying with Deities
Various museums in Washington, D.C. are increasingly becoming sites
and vehicles for the celebration and empowerment
of non-Christian religions and deities. The recent display of the primary
female Hindu deity in your nations capital clearly illustrates how
the powers that be gladly receive foreign gods but reject
the Creator of our Declaration of Independence.
No official has come forward to challenge these Hindu religious ceremonies
and rituals as a Constitutional violation of the separation of church
and state. On the other hand, last year a pastor and group of Christians
were arrested as they but paused and prayed in front of historical paintings
in the Capitol Rotunda. Christians are now arrested annually as they kneel
in prayer on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court.
The display of cultural religious artifacts, images and even idols is
one thing, but the active worship of specific and named deities in Americas
public museums in effect turning them into pagan temples
funded by your tax dollars, is quite another. (Intercessors for
America. 7/7/99.)
Nativity Scene In
The United States Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit ruled in
August that a Missouri city will be permitted to 8include a nativity scene
in its Christmas display. The City of Florrissant had been sued by the
American Civil Liberties Union for erecting a display at the City Civic
Center.
Cities must not be railroaded into excluding all religious references
during the holidays simply because they are afraid of being sued. According
to the Supreme Court, a display can have religious elements in it and
still be perfectly constitutional, stated Jennifer Schans, regional
coordinator for The Rutherford Institute. (Maranatha DayWatch. 8/25/99.)
Vouchers Stay
Arizona residents can get a tax break for giving money to groups
that offer scholarships to students at religious schools, the U.S. Supreme
Court ruled Oct. 4. The court let stand without any comment an Arizona
law that gives taxpayers an annual credit up to $500 for donating to charitable
"school tuition organizations," news reports said.
The organizations use the money to give scholarships to children at private
schools, 70% of which are religious. As much as $75 million a year in
public funds could be channeled into private education under the law,
Arizona officials said. The law had been challenged by the Arizona Civil
Liberties Union, Americans United for Separation of
Church and State, and organizations representing teachers.
The ruling provides a boost for efforts in other states to provide financial
help for families whose children and other private schools, observers
said. The case is the first of several to reach the Supreme Court in which
state governments attempt to help fund private or religious schools.
(Current News Summary. ReligionToday.com. 10/5/99)
Bible Week KO or OK?
A federal court allowed a town to proclaim a Bible Week. A district
court judge in Phoenix, Ariz., Sept. 30 dismissed a lawsuit against Cynthia
Dunham, the mayor of Gilbert, who had issued a proclamation for Nov. 21-28,
the week of Thanksgiving.
The lawsuit had been brought by the Arizona Civil Liberties Union, and
had resulted in a temporary restraining order forbidding Dunham to proceed
with the declaration. Bible Week is part of a national observation promoted
by the National Bible Association. (Current News Summary. 10/5/99.)
Columbine Tile Lawsuit
Columbine victims relatives and friends accused Jefferson
County school officials on 10/4/99 of violating their rights by refusing
to display their handmade tiles at the school because they contained religious
symbols.
The Rutherford Institute filed a lawsuit against the district in U.S.
District Court on behalf of several families and friends of those killed
in the April 20th massacre. Exhibiting this type of hostility toward
religion violated the establishment clause of the First Amendment,
said Jim Rouse, a Rutherford attorney.
The point here is the tremendous lengths government officials are
going to keep religion out of our schools. Were talking about a
4-inch tile with a 1-inch cross. Thats too much religion for Jefferson
County, he said. (The Gazette. 10/5/99.)
Bible Week KO or OK?
A federal court allowed a town to proclaim a Bible Week. A district
court judge in Phoenix, Ariz., Sept. 30 dismissed a lawsuit against Cynthia
Dunham, the mayor of Gilbert, who had issued a proclamation for Nov. 21-28,
the week of Thanksgiving.
The lawsuit had been brought by the Arizona Civil Liberties Union, and
had resulted in a temporary restraining order forbidding Dunham to proceed
with the declaration. Bible Week is part of a national observation promoted
by the National Bible Association. (Current News Summary. 10/5/99.)
Wall of Separation?
I think it would be wise for everyone to go down to their library
and read the ltter Jefferson wrote to the Baptists of Danbury, Conn. Then
it would be obvious that Jefferson was not seeking a wall of separation
between church and state as the ACLU and their followers interpret
it.
Instead, Jefferson was concerned that one religion would become nationalized
and all other religious denominations and beliefs would be left in the
cold. He wanted to ensure freedom of religion, not from religion.
Two days after Jefferson wrote this comment he was in the Capitol Building
in Washington, D.C., faithfully attending church among thousands. The
Supreme Court didnt have much to say about it either because there
was a church service being held in their building, too. (Steve Ledford.
Letter to the Editor. The Gazette. 9/15/99.)
Public Education Robs
Our liberal overseers have long since decided that religious teachings
have no place in public education. While Darwinism is mandatory, religion
is not even optional. Education has always meant more than instilling
knowledge; it has also meant cultivating the moral habits necessary to
continue a tradition.
Christian parents have correctly intuited the hidden agenda behind so
much state education. Their children have been weaned from Christian culture
and taught a godless cosmology in the guise of biology. Public schools
need not attack Christianity frontally; they merely have to keep the young
ignorant of their Christian heritage.
The battle over evolution and religion is really a battle between state
and parental authority. Making education private would be a giant step
in keeping with a great American tradition: decentralizing power.
(Joseph Sobran. Washington, D.C.-based columnist. The Gazette. 9/2/99.)
Jeffersons Religiosity
Enter most preserved 19th-century one-room schoolhouses. What they
share are the Ten Commandments hanging on walls and a depiction of George
Washington, often kneeling in prayer at Valley Forge.
Many today desire these religious symbols be returned to public school
classrooms. They long to re-live those days of yesteryear when students
studied the Bible after beginning the school day with prayers to the Almighty
who preserved Washington on bent knee. Where did the Ten Commandments
and prayer in public schools come from?
Thomas Jefferson carved a model of public education that embraced the
spirit of Christianity, holding high the Bible as the source and fountain
of all true wisdom, morals and government. He wanted public education
to foster those religious sentiments with which students of high culture
and keen minds mutually agreed. (Jack Van Ens. Guest Commentary.
The Denver Post. 7/11/99.)
Day of Prayer Nixed
A nonbinding resolution calling for a national Day of Prayer and
Fasting failed in the house on 6/29/99, as Congress waded once again into
volatile issues of religion and politics. Sponsored by Rep. Helen Chenoweth
(R-Idaho), the resolution recommended that national, state and local leaders
call the people they serve to observe a day of solemn prayer, fasting
and humiliation before God. The vote was 275 in favor, with 140
opposed and 11 members voting present. If there ever is a time to
call upon God, its now, Chenoweth said. (The Denver
Post. 6/30/99.)
A Blessing Booted!
A devout Christian who used to wish everyone a blessed day
at work has been ordered to stop her faith-tinged brand of sunshine or
be fired. USF Logistics of Indianapolis reprimanded Liz Anderson, an office
worker, after a client at Microsoft Corp. objected to her religious greeting
in an email, the Indianapolis Star and News said. Anderson, a member of
Phillips Temple CME Church, had been told repeatedly to stop the practice.
She has stopped now because she knows she could be fired, the newspaper
said.
I don't see what's wrong with it, Anderson said. It's
just my way of saying, Have a nice day. Microsoft has insisted that
documents be presented in "a professional manner," and that
additional religious, personal, or political statements are not welcome,
reports said.
Anderson's situation is becoming more common in the American workplace,
the Star said. The number of religious discrimination complaints filed
with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has risen 29%
since 1998, to 1,786 annually. Common complaints arise from Christians
who were forced to work on Christmas even though other employees had volunteered
to fill in for them, Muslim women prohibited from wearing religious head
coverings to work, and Jews forbidden to wear yarmulkes.
Religious groups of various faiths have supported federal legislation
to ensure workplace protections for religious freedoms at work. They back
the Religious Workplace Freedom Act, which has failed to pass for the
last two years. Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) is continuing to push for the
legislation this year. (Current News Summary. ReligionToday.com.10/28/99;
The Beacon Journal - Akron, OH.10/30/99.)
Nativity Scene In
The United States Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit ruled in
August that a Missouri city will be permitted to 8include a nativity scene
in its Christmas display. The City of Florrissant had been sued by the
American Civil Liberties Union for erecting a display at the City Civic
Center.
Cities must not be railroaded into excluding all religious references
during the holidays simply because they are afraid of being sued. According
to the Supreme Court, a display can have religious elements in it and
still be perfectly constitutional, stated Jennifer Schans, regional
coordinator for The Rutherford Institute. (Maranatha DayWatch. 8/25/99.)
Natural Revelation
Children believe in God regardless of whether they are exposed to
religious faith, a study found. Oxford University psychologist Olivera
Petrovitch and her research assistants found that children they studied
in Britain and Japan gave similar answers when asked who created various
natural objects, she reported in the magazine Science & Spirit.
The children, who had not been influenced by concepts of God from organized
religions, had abstract notions of a creator. Petrovitch's researchers
in Japan said they were surprised at the children's responses. My
Japanese research assistants kept telling me, We Japanese don't think
about God as creator - it's just not part of Japanese philosophy,
she said. (Current News Summary. 11/2/99.)
Sporting Events Prayer
Congressmen asked the Supreme Court to support prayer before sporting
events at public schools. The House of Representatives passed a nonbinding
resolution asking the court to support the constitutionality of such prayers
when it considers a case in
coming weeks, The Associated Press said. The resolution carries no legal
force and is merely an expression of the representatives wishes.
Texas Reps. Henry Bonilla, a Republican, and Charles Stenholm, a Democrat,
introduced the resolution in response to an appeals courts February
decision banning the
prayers in Texas, Mississippi, and Louisiana. An important religious tradition
has been threatened by a foolish decision in federal court,
Bonilla said. This resolution gives the U.S. Congress a chance to
take a stand. (Current News Summary. 11/4/99.)
FCC Riles Religion
A little-noticed decision by federal regulators about when religious
programming counts as educational has touched off a storm among the nations
religious broadcasters, who complain the action amounts to an infringement
on what they can air.
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), in deciding a license transfer
last month between a public television affiliate and a religious broadcast
station in Pittsburgh, determined that not all programming dealing with
religious matters qualifies as educational.
In its ruling, the FCC defined more clearly what standards must be met.
Specifically, the commission said broadcasters must devote 50% of their
regularly scheduled air time to educational programs. The commission also
defined educational content.
Programming primarily devoted to religious exhortation, proselytizing
or statements of personally held religious views and beliefs generally
would not qualify as general educational programming, the
FCC ruled. And in a footnote, it said church services also normally would
not qualify as general educational programming.
The decision has drawn fire from religious broadcasters, who argue that
such distinctions are arbitrary. According to Brandt Gustavson, president
of the National Religious Broadcasters, The order contains a disquieting
implication that the government may restrict certain strains of religious
speech The net effect I think will be less preaching of the gospel,
less programming of church services. (The Gazette. 1/11/2000.)
Religious Meeting Limits?
Local governments would not be able to pass ordinances limiting
the amount of time residents spend in religious study in private residences
under a measure headed to the Colorado House floor.
The House Local Government committee approved HB1176 by Majority Leader
Doug Dean, R-Colorado Springs. The measure would pre-empt any ordinance
limiting religious study in private homes.
Dean said he knew of three such ordinances, including one in Colorado
Springs. The ordinances limit such study sessions to once per month to
prevent traffic and noise problems, he said.
I used to participate in a Bible study group every other Friday
night with a couple of other couples, and I was surprised to find we were
in violation of the Colorado Springs ordinance, he said. He said
such ordinances violate the Constitutions guarantee of freedom of
religion.
In August a Denver couple filed a federal lawsuit against a zoning law
preventing them from holding more than one prayer meeting a month at their
house. Denver dropped its challenge to the couples lawsuit last
month. (The Gazette. 1/18/2000.)
Separation of Church and Sex?
A Christian group planning a sexual abstinence rally was denied
funding by city commissioners concerned about violating constitutionally
required government separation from religious activities. Its
just one of those slippery areas. Im not sure we want to go there.
said Mayor Paula DeLaney.
Members of the local chapter of the Fellowship of Christian Athletes and
the Alachua County Youth Ministers Association (Gainesville, FL) had asked
the city to waive fees the groups expect to pay the city for its True
Love Waits rally planned in February at the citys Martin Luther
King Center. The rally is a non-denominational, free event aimed at challenging
students to abstain from sex until marriage.
City Recrreation Director Cliff Crawford said city funding of the event
would create a conflict between public use and religious use.
Another Commissioner, Pegeen Hanrahan, said, I presume that if it
is being put on by the Fellowship of Christian Athletes that it is Christian,
our Jewish and Muslim residents shouldnt have to fund.
(The Gainesville Sun. 1/25/2000.)
Nine Inch Nails
Fans of the alternative rock band Nine Inch Nails have
made the Southern Baptist family magazine HomeLife a cyberspace
target in response to a critical review of the bands most recent
musical recording.
Trent Reznor, 34, the groups lead singer and primary lyricist, once
fostered a relationship with satanic-rocker Marilyn Manson. Reznors
studio, which he founded in 1992, helped Manson release his first major
album entitled AntiChrist Super Star. Reznor has a huge following
among teenagers. Susan Swann, a spokeswoman for Nothing Records, told
Baptist Press she could neither confirm nor deny whether Reznor had sent
an obscene e-mail to HomeLife. (Current Baptist News Summary. 1/25/2000.)
No Courtroom Verses
A convicted killer who has been on San Quentins death row
for the past 21 years had his sentence set aside recently when a Los Angeles
federal judge ruled that the jury foreman in his trial committed misconduct
by reciting biblical passages about capital punishment during penalty
deliberations.
One of the passages imparted to the jury was Who so sheddeth mans
blood, by man shall his blood be shed. The jury was deadlocked 7
to 5 at the time in favor of life without the possibility of parole. After
hearing from the foreman, the panel voted unanimously to send Fields to
the gas chamber. (Los Angeles Times. David Rosenzweig, Staff Writer. 1/21/2000.)
Columbine Anti-Christs
Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold blasphemed Christ and directed invectives
at Christian students and others in a video prior to the killings at Columbine
High School last year. The two made five videos before the shooting, venting
their rage at athletes, minorities, and Christians, according to Christianity
Today.
The tape reveals Harris saying, Go Romans! Thank God they crucified
that (expletive), making a vulgar reference to Jesus Christ. Both
teens then began chanting, Go Romans and cheering. What
would Jesus do? Klebold yelled. What would I do? he
said, pretending to fire a gun at the camera, the publication said.
The boys singled out Christian student Rachel Scott on the tape, calling
her a godly whore and stuck-up, it continued.
Harris mimicked her faith. Yeah I love Jesus. I love Jesus.
Shut the (expletive) up, he said. Scott had told Klebold and Harris
about Christ during a class they shared, and confronted them about a violent
video they made, her father, Darrell, said. She was one of the first to
be killed in the attack.
The killer hated God, Darrell Scott said. There seemed to be an
extra element of hatred and vengeance there. Police allowed victims
parents to see the videos, which have not been released to the public,
Christianity Today said. A Time magazine report included some details
from the tapes but did not mention the anti-Christian elements.
(Current News Summary. 1/28/2000.)
State Cancels Scholarship
The state of Washington cancelled funds awarded to a local scholarship
recipient when it learned the student was using the scholarship money
to study theology, alleging it created a conflict with the state constitution
that mandates the separation of church and state.
The money was awarded from the Promise Scholarship fund, which provides
financial assistance to students from low and middle-income families who
exhibit high academic credentials and are enrolled in an accredited public
or private post-secondary school within the state of Washington.
The student, 10-year-old Joshua Davey, had already enrolled at Northwest
College in Kirkland, a small private school affiliated with the Assemblies
of God denomination, when he learned he wouldnt get the scholarship
he earned. Now Davey is suing Washington Governor Gary Locke and the state
agency that administers the scholarship, arguing that the states
exclusionary clause against studying theology amounts to religious discrimination.
The actions of the state of Washington represent a very troubling
display of religious discrimination and hostility, said Kevin Theriot,
a senior counsel with the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ),
an independent public interest law firm that is handling the case. The
state cannot simply single out a student and withhold state scholarship
funds just because he has decided to pursue religious studies. We believe
the states action and policy are not only wrong, but unconstitutional,
Theriot said. (Conservative News Service. 1/18/2000.)
Dropping God from Morality
A southern Indiana school board has dropped a reference to God from
a list of precepts promoting good student conduct. But a vote to change
the ground-breaking guidelines may not avoid a lawsuit by the American
Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
The Scott County, Indiana, District 2 Board voted Jan. 11th to remove
the first precept, which read, Trust in God. The remaining
10 have been posted in lobbies and other areas of each of the countys
seven schools.
Printed on light gold 11-by-14 inch paper, the guidelines have also been
changed from their original form to include a picture of a penny beside
each point. The name now reads, Common Cents Precepts to Promote
a Virtuous and Civil School Authority.
The addition of the penny is upsetting the ACLU. Ken Falk, legal director
for Indianas affiliate of the national organization, is withholding
a decision about a lawsuit until he talks to his client. Obviously,
the face of a penny with Lincoln has In God We Trust on it,
so I dont know if anything has really been changed, said Falk.
(Baptist Press News. 1/17/2000.)
Religion in School Debate
The controversy about the separation of church and state continued
on Jan. 27th as the Senate Education Committee held hearings on a bill
that would put religion in the classroom.
The bill, sponsored by Sen. John Andrews, R-Englewood, would require public
school teachers to enforce a 60-second pause for reflection at the beginning
of the day and to post the Ten Commandments in the classroom.
Opponents dont think the classroom is the right place for those
values to be taught or re-enforced. Several students said the moment of
silence and the posting of the Ten Commandments would not offend students
practicing other religions. (The Gazette. 1/28/2000.)
Good Friday Schools
A Maryland law requiring public schools to close on Good Friday
is constitutional, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Jan. 18th. The justices
rejected an appeal by Judith Koenick, a retired teacher, who said the
law violates the separation of church and state and sends a message
of inclusion to Christian children and a message of exclusion to their
Jewish, Muslim, and nonbelieving classmates.
A lower court had ruled that the law serves the pragmatic legitimate
secular purpose of avoiding high absenteeism among teachers and
students on the days surrounding Easter. Many people travel over the increasingly
secularized holiday of Easter, school board lawyers argued, The
Associated Press said. Thirteen states designated Good Friday as a legal
holiday but only Maryland, Illinois, and North Dakota require schools
to close. (Current News Summary. 1/19/2000.)
A Profanity Lawsuit
A Mormon who wants to be an actress is suing the University of Utah,
claiming she was drummed out of the drama program for refusing to deliver
lines containing profanity. Christian Axson-Flynn, 20, says faculty members
violated her right to religious freedom. Her lawsuit, filed Jan. 13, seeks
unspecified damages.
Ms. Axson-Flynn was asked during her audition whether she would be uncomfortable
in any performing situations. She said she would feel uncomfortable taking
the Lords name in vain and saying the F-word.
After she was accepted by the program, Ms. Axson-Flynn asked if she could
substitute words in a scene that contained language she found inappropriate.
According to the lawsuit, a faculty member told her to get over
her inhibition and said she could use profanity and still be a good
Mormon.
Her lawyer, James McConkie, said requiring her to use profanity would
be like telling a Jewish student taking a cooking course that he would
have to eat pork. (Washington Post. 1/14/2000.)
Unconstitutional Vouchers?
A federal judge ruled 12/20/99 that a program giving thousands of
Cleveland children taxpayer-financed vouchers to attend parochial schools
violates the Constitutions separation of church and state.
U.S. District Judge Solomon Oliver Jr. wrote that the voucher program,
enacted by the Ohio Legislature in 1995, has the effect of advancing
religion through government-sponsored religious indoctrination.
Noting nearly all the Ohio students attend parochial schools, he added,
A program that is so skewed toward religion necessarily results
in indoctrination attributable to the government and provides financial
incentives to attend religious schools.
The governor and attorney general of Ohio immediately vowed to appeal
the decision, and all parties to the case agreed to let children continue
attending schools under the voucher program until the appeal is considered.
(The Gazette. 12/21/99.)
Clintons Religious Disgust?
The president of the Southern Baptist Convention said President
Clinton has very few convictions and accused his administration
of distorting Christian evangelism as religious hatred, the denominations
newspaper recently reported.
Paige Patterson, the leader of the 15.8 million-member denomination that
includes Clinton and Gore as members, said he was offended by White House
spokesman Joe Lockharts comments during a Dec. 16th media briefing.
Patterson said the Clinton administration was trying to bully Southern
Baptists for upholding beliefs about sharing the Christian faith with
people of other religion or no religion.
Apparently, because the President has very few convictions, he harbors
deep resentment against those who do, Patterson told The Baptist
Press in an article posted on the Internet. (The Gazette. 12/23/99.)
School Activity Fees
A debate over the right not to speak was at the heart of a Supreme
Court argument concerning student speech on public university campuses.
At issue was the University of Wisconsins mandatory student activity
fee, which goes to support essentially any nonpartisan student group that
applies for a share.
With 125 students groups receiving money, three law students at the Madison
campus, describing themselves as conservatives and Christians, objected.
They argued they should be able to withhold their money from 18 groups
that support gay rights, womens rights and other generally liberal
causes. (The Gazette. 11/10/99.)
Public Aid for Parochials?
Struggling once more with the circumstances under which government
can support religious organizations, the Supreme Court on December 1,
1999 heard a constitutional challenge to a federal law that provides computers,
software and library equipment to parochial schools.
Federal education block grants in Louisiana are in question. However nationwide,
the courts decision will also apply to private religious schools
having a major impact on President Clintons proposal to connect
every classroom and school library in America to the Internet at a cost
of $800 million. Furthermore, the case will clarify the constitutional
boundaries of church-state relations on a broader level. (Christian
Coalition News. 12/6/99.)
Good Friday Holiday
Good Friday is still a holiday in Indiana. The U.S. Supreme Court
declined without comment an appeal challenging the constitutionality of
the state holiday, The Associated press said. It rejected a challenge
to a similar law in Maryland in January.
Good Friday is a religious holiday and should not be recognized by the
state, attorneys for Russell Bridenbaugh argued. A federal magistrate
dismissed his suit in 1997 and the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld
that ruling last year, AP said.
The appeals court ruled that Good Friday has no religious significance
under the law. To Indiana, Good Friday is nothing but a Friday falling
in the middle of a long vacation-less spring a day which employees
should take off to rejuvenate themselves, a court panel said. Good
Friday commemorates the day Christ was crucified. (Current News
Summary. Religion Today. 3/8/2000.)
State-Church Unification?
A pastor who received an urgent package in the mail from the U.S.
Census Bureau containing pamphlets and mini-sermons for his congregation
is outraged at what he perceives to be government intrusion into church
affairs.
Federal Express delivered an overnight letter to Pastor Albert Hitchcock
of Wiser Lake Chapel in Lynden, Wash. There were folders containing announcements
and messages for the next six weeks to be printed in church bulletins
and announced to church members during worship services.
According to one pamphlet to be passed out to the parishioners, there
is a letter from Census Bureau Chief Kenneth Prewitt saying: Census
2000 must enlist strong partners to achieve the most accurate and complete
census possible Your dedication to your congregation and your community
as well as your credibility throughout the communtiy makes you an ideal
partner for this critical endeavor. By helping us spread the word that
the Census is important and safe, you will play a key role in making Census
2000 a success.
Pastor Hitchcock was incensed. Almost every day I read something
wherein the Church is being told to stay out of governments business
indeed out of the public square altogether. If I put out voting
guides, I am told I jeopardize our tax-exempt status, for example. So,
where does the Census Bureau think they get the right to commandeer Gods
Church to do government business? Hitchcock interprets the Bureaus
soliciation as a violation of the First Amendment. (WorldNetDaily.
3/18/2000.)
Students Right to Pray
In a dramatic and urgently-needed victory for student graduation
prayer, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, in a 10-2 vote, issued a 94-page
decision upholding the rights of students to pray and articulate their
beliefs during graduation ceremonies.
The court found that since the Duval County (Jacksonville, FL) policy
unambiguously recognizes the difference between government
speech endorsing religion prohibited by the Establishment Clause
and private speech that may contain a prayerful message
protected by the Free Speech and Free Exercise Clauses their policy
is constitutional. The court affirmed the earlier decision of a district
court.
Schools should not be in the business of censoring students speech
simply because the message is religious. Such discrimination is nothing
less than educational tyranny. Public schools of all places
should accommodate and nurture students who have found peace and fulfillment
in their faith. (WorldNetDaily. Rev. Jerry Falwell. Right
to Pray at Graduation. 3/18/2000.)
Bible History Scandalized
Schools which have Bible classes must now teach them as literature
after complaints that Bible history courses were used to preach religious
views. The changes came after People for the American Way Foundation issued
a report in January concluding that 14 school districts violate the state
constitutional requirement that history of the Bible be taught in a secular,
objective way.
Under the new guidelines announced by Floridas Education Commissioner
Tom Gallagher, course titles will change. The courses would be classified
as humanities, rather than history. According to PAW, the classes have
been used to teach the Bible as Historical fact and to promote
a Christian viewpoint. (Tallahassee Democrat Online. 3/17/2000.)
Florida Vouchers Nixed
For the 8 months, children in Florida who had been attending sailing
schools have had the opportunity to learn in more fruitful conditions.
Florida adopted the first statewide voucher program and is also the first
state to tie school performance on standardized test with voucher eligibility.
Its unique system has helped numerous children escape schools that repeatedly
failed to adequately equip them with the basic knowledge to pass the exam.
On Tuesday, March 15, 2000, Leon County Circuit Judge L. Ralph Smith Jr.
struck down Floridas Opportunity Scholarship Program. He ruled that
the states constitution barred students from using taxpayer money
for private school tuition. This decision is expect to be appealed directly
to the State Supreme Court. (Traditional Values Coalition News.
3/17/2000.)
Anti-Catholic U.N.?
The National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL) and the Women
Leaders Online, both groups enthusiastically endorsing Gore for president,
are supporting See Change, a campaign to oust the Vatican
from the United Nations.
Since 1964, the Vatican has had permanent observer status
at the U.N. enabling it to play an active role and vote with other
countries at U.N. conferences, but not in the General Assembly. Republican
National Committee Chairman Jim Nicholson is demanding that Vice president
Al Gore repudiate these two groups that are calling for the eviction of
the Vatican from the United Nations.
As a Catholic, I am appalled that these two groups are trying to
silence the voice of Pope John Paul and to prevent one billion Catholics
from speaking up for morality and justice at the worlds most prominent
international forum, Nicholson said. (WorldNetDaily. 3/18/2000.)
Filtering Out Religion
Internet filters sound appealing if they are filtering out X-rated
material or pornography; but what if they are filtering out religion?
President Bill Clinton has taken the lead in endorsing a Anti-Defamation
League (ADA) filter geared towards eliminating so-called hate.
However, a state run test filtered out materials such as the U.S. Constitution,
the Bible, the Declaration of Independence, all of Shakespeares
plays, and George Washingtons farewell address.
President Clinton is attempting to persuade Americans to install this
hate filter in the name of religious and ethnic tolerance.
White House support of this ADL filter could have a grave effect on the
policy decisions of public schools and libraries all over the country.
(Traditional Values Coalition News. 3/3/2000.)
Death Penalty Overturned
The Georgia Supreme Court overturned a death sentence on 3/6/2000
in a Clayton County murder case because an assistant district attorney
urged trial jurors to follow biblical mandates. The justices affirmed
the conviction of Anthony Carruthers for the 1995 murder of Jeanette Williams,
but said a new jury should decide whether he lives or dies.
Carruthers was convicted in March 1998 of attacking Williams during a
visit to her home on Dec. 12, 1995. Evidence showed he choked her, cut
her throat and almost severed her head, and stabbed her repeatedly. Williams
was in her late 20s.
During closing arguments in the penalty phase of the trial, D. Brandon
Hornsby, the assistant district attorney, cited passages from the books
of Romans, Genesis and Matthew, telling jurors all they who take
the sword shall die by the sword. Hornsby argued that the Bible
says society must deter criminals by taking the lives of people who kill
other people, the justices noted in their ruling.
In explaining the Supreme Courts ruling, presiding Justice Norman
S. Fletcher wrote that such references inject the often irrelevant
and inflammatory issue of religion into the sentencing process and improperly
appeal to the religious beliefs of jurors in their decision on whether
a person should live or die.
Georgia law requires the Supreme Court to review death sentences to determine
whether they were imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice
or any other arbitrary factor. (The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
3/7/2000.)
Ohio Boots God
Ohios motto, With God, all things are possible,
was declared unconstitutional recently by a federal appeals court that
said the phrase amounts to a government endorsement of Christianity.
The 2-1 decision by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a lower
courts ruling that permitted Ohios use of the motto. The motto
was taken from the New Testament, specifically Matthew 19:26, which quotes
Jesus Christ.
In a dissent, Circuit Judge David Nelson said he found Ohios motto
no more troubling than the words In God We Trust on U.S. coins.
Ohios motto was challenged by the American Civil Liberties Union.
(The Gazette. 4/26/2000.)
University Bans Christians
Tufts Christian Fellowship was stripped of its official student
organization status in a secret, midnight meeting because the group
would not allow an admitted homosexual to hold a leadership position.
Tufts University administration de-recognized an affiliate of international
college ministry InterVarsity Christian Fellowship.
The universitys decision was prompted by a complaint against the
Christian club by Julie Catalano, who claimed she had been discriminated
against because of her sexual orientation. Catalano sought a leadership
position within the Christian group and asserted her belief that homosexual
practice is a biblically acceptable lifestyle.
Curtis Chang, TCFs leader and affiliate chaplain at the university
said, Barring religious groups from using religious-based values
in leadership selection is the same as prohibiting them from practicing
the religious nature of their group.
Hadley Arkes, a jurisprudence professor at Amherst College, wrote a letter
to Change after the decision was handed down. According to Arkes, What
the University has done is nothing less than declared orthodox Christianity
and Judaism as illegitimate, as religious traditions that should have
no legitimate place in the life of the University, or in the lives of
the students collected there. (WorldNetDaily news. 4/25/2000.)
Forcing Gay Immorality
Another campus Christian group in New England is facing a rebuke
over gay rights. Middlebury College in Vermont is debating whether to
punish an InterVarsity Christian Fellowship student group that refuses
to allow Ryan Palsrok, who is gay, to hold a leadership post. The school
is considering changing its handbook to force the Middlebury Christian
Fellowship to allow gay leaders.
Palsrok was denied a leadership position not because he is gay, but because
he does not believe homosexual practice is wrong, Kerra Struthers, an
InterVaristy Christian Fellowship worker, said. Anyone can attend the
groups meetings, but leadership is restricted to people who
hold to traditional or orthodox interpretation of the Bible, she
said. The policy is intended to preserve the integrity of the organization
as an evangelical Christian group that believes the Bible is unique, divinely
inspired, and entirely trustworthy. (Current News Summary.
5/3/2000.)
NDOP Victory
The National Day of Prayer organization won a court victory last
week that has implications for other religious groups. The 9th Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals in San Francisco ruled that cities are not allowed
to deny free services during public events just because the events are
organized for religious reasons. The decision overturned a previous ruling.
Religion should not be used to exclude citizens from public forums or
publicly funded services 'as long as those services are provided
to all speakers in the forum on a religiously neutral basis, the
court ruled. The annual national Day of Prayer is held on the first Thursday
of May. (Current News Summary. 4/24/2000.)
Praying Disciplined
A Georgia high school student faces possible disciplinary action
for repeatedly praying aloud during a state-mandated period of quiet reflection.
John Robert Cruz is continuing to pray aloud after being suspended for
10 days for defying a school prayer law enacted by the Georgia legislature
in 1994, which requires a moment of silent reflection at the start of
the school day.
Carver High School principal Cleophus Hope said Cruz had otherwise been
a model student. Assistant School Superintendent Brenda Dozier said Cruz
had been encouraged to start a prayer group or pray alone in a separate
room so that he does not disturb others quite reflection. She said
Cruz could be suspended again, required to undergo counseling, transferred
to an alternative school or expelled. I will not stop praying,
the 14-year-old said. (CBS MarketWatch. 4/7/2000.)
Home Educators Arrested
A Virginia couple has filed a civil rights lawsuit against officials
of the Richmond County School District in Warsaw because an assistant
school principal had them arrested for pulling their children out of public
school.
Gerald and Angela Balderson withdrew their eight-year-old son from the
public school district after deciding to home school him. They filed the
required legal notice with the local school superintendent on Feb. 25th.
A suit has been filed by the Home School Legal Defense Association and
charges the entire school board and the assistant principal with gross
negligence, false arrest and violation of the 14th Amendment guarantee
of due process of law. The suit seeks $50,000 in compensation, along with
$50,000 in punitive damages for each parent. (WorldNetDaily. 4/10/2000.)